Kernel Bounds for Structural Parameterizations of Pathwidth

Assuming the AND-distillation conjecture, the Pathwidth problem of determining whether a given graph G has pathwidth at most k admits no polynomial kernelization with respect to k. The present work studies the existence of polynomial kernels for Pathwidth with respect to other, structural, parameters. Our main result is that, unless NP is in coNP/poly, Pathwidth admits no polynomial kernelization even when parameterized by the vertex deletion distance to a clique, by giving a cross-composition from Cutwidth. The cross-composition works also for Treewidth, improving over previous lower bounds by the present authors. For Pathwidth, our result rules out polynomial kernels with respect to the distance to various classes of polynomial-time solvable inputs, like interval or cluster graphs. This leads to the question whether there are nontrivial structural parameters for which Pathwidth does admit a polynomial kernelization. To answer this, we give a collection of graph reduction rules that are safe for Pathwidth. We analyze the success of these results and obtain polynomial kernelizations with respect to the following parameters: the size of a vertex cover of the graph, the vertex deletion distance to a graph where each connected component is a star, and the vertex deletion distance to a graph where each connected component has at most c vertices.Comment: This paper contains the proofs omitted from the extended abstract published in the proceedings of Algorithm Theory - SWAT 2012 - 13th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops, Helsinki, Finland, July 4-6, 201

On Sparsification for Computing Treewidth

We investigate whether an n-vertex instance (G,k) of Treewidth, asking whether the graph G has treewidth at most k, can efficiently be made sparse without changing its answer. By giving a special form of OR-cross-composition, we prove that this is unlikely: if there is an e > 0 and a polynomial-time algorithm that reduces n-vertex Treewidth instances to equivalent instances, of an arbitrary problem, with O(n^{2-e}) bits, then NP is in coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its third level. Our sparsification lower bound has implications for structural parameterizations of Treewidth: parameterizations by measures that do not exceed the vertex count, cannot have kernels with O(k^{2-e}) bits for any e > 0, unless NP is in coNP/poly. Motivated by the question of determining the optimal kernel size for Treewidth parameterized by vertex cover, we improve the O(k^3)-vertex kernel from Bodlaender et al. (STACS 2011) to a kernel with O(k^2) vertices. Our improved kernel is based on a novel form of treewidth-invariant set. We use the q-expansion lemma of Fomin et al. (STACS 2011) to find such sets efficiently in graphs whose vertex count is superquadratic in their vertex cover number.Comment: 21 pages. Full version of the extended abstract presented at IPEC 201

A Branch and Bound Algorithm for Exact, Upper, and Lower Bounds on Treewidth

In this paper, a branch and bound algorithm for computing the treewidth of a graph is presented. The method incorporates extensions of existing results, and uses new pruning and reduction rules, based upon roperties of the adopted branching strategy. We discuss how the algorithm can not only be used to obtain exact bounds for the treewidth, but also to obtain upper and/or lower bounds. Computational results of the algorithm are presented

Safe reduction rules for weighted treewidth

Several sets of reductions rules are known for preprocessing a graph when computing its treewidth. In this paper, we give reduction rules for a weighted variant of treewidth, motivated by the analysis of algorithms for probabilistic networks. We present two general reduction rules that are safe for weighted treewidth. They generalise many of the existing reduction rules for treewidth. Experimental results show that these reduction rules can significantly reduce the problem size for several instances of real-life probabilistic networks

On the Maximum Cardinality Search Lower Bound for Treewidth

The Maximum Cardinality Search algorithm visits the vertices of a graph in some order, such that at each step, an unvisited vertex that has the largest number of visited neighbors becomes visited. An MCS-ordering of a graph is an ordering of the vertices that can be generated by the Maximum Cardinality Search algorithm. The visited degree of a vertex v in an MCS-ordering is the number of neighbors of v that are before v in the ordering. The visited degree of an MCS-ordering ψ of G is the maximum visited degree over all vertices v in ψ. The maximum visited degree over all MCS-orderings of graph G is called its maximum visited degree. Lucena [14] showed that the treewidth of a graph G is at least its maximum visited degree. We show that the maximum visited degree is of size O(log n) for planar graphs, and give examples of planar graphs G with maximum visited degree k with O(k!) vertices, for all k ∈ N. Given a graph G, it is NP-complete to determine if its maximum visited degree is at least k, for any fixed k ≥ 7. Also, this problem does not have a polynomial time approximation algorithm with constant ratio, unless P=NP. Variants of the problem are also shown to be NP-complete. We also propose and experimentally analysed some heuristics for the problem. Several tiebreakers for the MCS algorithm are proposed and evaluated. We also give heuristics that give upper bounds on the value of the maximum visited degree of a graph, which appear to give results close to optimal on many graphs from real life applications

Lower Bounds for Dominating Set in Ball Graphs and for Weighted Dominating Set in Unit-Ball Graphs

Recently it was shown that many classic graph problems—Independent Set, Dominating Set, Hamiltonian Cycle, and more—can be solved in subexponential time on unit-ball graphs. More precisely, these problems can be solved in 2O(n1−1/d) time on unit-ball graphs in Rd , which is tight under ETH. The result can be generalized to intersection graphs of similarly-sized fat objects.\u3cbr/\u3e\u3cbr/\u3eFor Independent Set the same running time can be achieved for non-similarly-sized fat objects, and for the weighted version of the problem. We show that such generalizations most likely are not possible for Dominating Set: assuming ETH, we prove that\u3cbr/\u3ethere is no algorithm with running time 2o(n) for Dominating Set on (non-unit) ball graphs in R3 ;\u3cbr/\u3e\u3cbr/\u3ethere is no algorithm with running time 2o(n) for Weighted Dominating Set on unit-ball graphs in R3 ;\u3cbr/\u3e\u3cbr/\u3ethere is no algorithm with running time 2o(n) for Dominating Set, Connected Dominating Set, or Steiner Tree on intersections graphs of arbitrary convex (but non-constant-complexity) objects in the plane